Category Archives: Professional

SAMPSON JUST IMMEASURABLE

Dateline: INDIANAPOLIS

Let’s not ask the real Ralph Sampson to stand up, please.

Sampson in his underwear already is 7 feet 4 inches, an altitude with which the rest of us are unfamiliar, except on those rare occasions when someone might ask us to stand on a ladder to wash an elephant.

But the world of professional basketball would like to see just how far Sampson can stretch, for when that happens, as it did in inspired moments of Sunday’s National Basketball Association All-Star game, the sport becomes something never imagined by Dr. James Naismith or any of his heirs, who all now apparently live in Indiana and are convinced they know more about basketball than the rest of the world put together.

“Sampson is still growing,” said Los Angeles Lakers’ and West coach Pat Riley. “Growing in his basketball life, I mean. You look at him now and you just say, ‘Wow.’

“And then you think of what he can become, and you cannot imagine where he’ll be, where he’ll take basketball. He will have an impact no one else has ever had on this league.”

Or, to quote Mr. Magic Johnson of the Lakers, many of whose 15 assists went to Sampson in the West’s 140-129 disposal of its geographic opposite in the Hoosier Dome: “You bring the ball up, and you take two guys into the paint with you, and then you just flip it over your head and here comes Sampson. Woooo. Woosh. Wham.

“You can’t wait to give it to him again. You say: ‘Let’s do it. Let’s go again. Here it comes, big guy.’ You look up and there he is, so high, and you know the game is changing. Whooeee.”

“Playing like that,” allowed Sampson, “is a lot of fun.”

K.C. Jones, the East coach from Boston, mused: “You coach against a team like that and you try to do a halfway decent job on Kareem (Abdul-Jabbar). That’s a maybe. And then Magic, that’s a maybe. And George Gervin hits 10 of 10 or 20 of 20, and still you think there’s a chance.

“Then you see a guy like Sampson, a guy that tall filling the lane, bringing the ball up, getting offensive boards, playing defense, blocking shots. Sampson was kind of awesome today.”

Awesome translated into numbers is 24 points and 10 rebounds in 29 minutes of play, all of them in motion.

As long as there are so many people saying such nice things about him, or the press voting him the most valuable star of stars, Sampson will never have to speak for himself, which he has always had a tough time doing, though he tries to prove his education at Virginia wasn’t wasted.

“I just want to be able to do what there is to do,” Sampson said.

Which is? “Drive, dribble, shoot, whatever has to be done,” Sampson said. “I’d love to play point guard.”

The point is, Sampson is not supposed to be gyrating like a playground punk, juking and jamming and driving. He is supposed to be standing right under the basket, like all 7-footers before him, maybe skyhooking when the mood is right but mostly reaching over the rim while pygmies claw at his waist.

That’s the way he did it in college. That’s the way he did it in Houston last year, his first season as a pro. That’s the way he might have done it forever had not Houston drafted another 7-footer, Akeem Olajuwon, to take the interior pounding and free Sampson to be the best that he can be.

“Ralph is a better forward than center,” said Johnson.

“He is too versatile to just play in the pivot,” said Abdul-Jabbar. “It limits him.”

The votes of NBA fans put Sampson in the West’s starting lineup, but Riley’s sense of history kept him on the same floor with L.A.’s Johnson, who knows how to make ordinary giants look great, and what we saw on a snowy Sunday in Indy was just a hint of things to come.

“I would have to think in my own mind that he would be much better if he played with me,” said Johnson. “If I played with him all the time, I’d have 25 assists a game.”

Sampson with Johnson certainly impressed Riley, whose chief regret is that he has but the one.

“You can’t help marveling at the novelty of both,” said Riley. “Here is Magic, a 6-9 point guard, and there is Sampson, a 7-4 small forward.

“Nobody really knows what to do with either one, yet. They are just too unorthodox. They are stretching the perimeters of the game.”

“I really don’t know what I can do, what my limits are,” Sampson said. “All I know is I can do a lot more than I do now.

“I just want to get better and enjoy the days to come.”

So say we all.

NBA PUTS MONEY WHERE MOUTHS ARE

Dateline: INDIANAPOLIS

Alex English opened his mail and $5 fell out. He read the enclosed letter, printed neatly in a novice hand. “I want to help the people in Ethiopia,” it said.

“Chills went through me,” English said. “It was like she was in tune with me.

“She was 6 years old. How much does $5 mean to someone who is 6?”

How much does $2,500 mean to the winner of Sunday’s National Basketball Association All-Star game? Or $1,500 to the loser?

To the wealthy warriors of America’s climate-controlled arenas, probably less than to the generous child English had touched when he first went public with his concern for unfortunate humans a half-world away.

But added up, 12 winners and 12 losers, the total is $48,000, and with a supplement from the NBA, it will mean that $100,000 will be sent to the pained citizens of Ethiopia, though none may know English, the man or the language.

“For what they need,” said English, “it’s still not much.”

You’ve seen the pictures, the heart-stabbing pictures of skeletons that are still children, of mothers crying over dead babies and the raw, unforgiving African land that has dried up and stolen the future.

English saw them, too, after a full meal last October in his generous home in Denver, where he works as a shooting forward for the Nuggets basketball team.

“I wanted to do something,” English said.

English is a sincere and sensitive man, a published poet, if the truth be known.

He grew up poor in South Carolina.

“Nothing like the people of Ethiopia are going through,” he said.

For the last five years, English has sent $150 a month to fight world hunger, his private contribution to anonymous bellies, but Ethiopia was real, in nearly living color on his television set, and English felt its cruelty.

“It was the kids,” English said. “I have kids of my own. The kids I saw starving wouldn’t make it through the day. I knew I had to do something.” What English did was call Larry Fleischer, who runs the pro basketball players’ union, of which English is a vice president. English suggested that this year’s All-Stars donate their pay, even though he did not know who the All-Stars would be or even if he would be one.

“These are the same people who are thought of as harsh, stingy and selfish,” English said. “I’m just one guy. It took all these others to be willing, and I commend them on the gesture. I’m proud to be in the NBA just because of this.”

Pro basketball is not the first sport to embrace charity. Having a social conscience is an established and foolproof image-booster.

But basketball may be the first pro sport in which the athletes actually took money from their own pockets, or didn’t put it in, as the case may be.

“Okay,” English conceded, “this doesn’t hurt our image, but that’s not why we did it. We weren’t out to prove anything to anybody. This wasn’t for purposes of publicity; it was just a way to get people involved doing something about a serious situation.

“There are millions of starving people over there. This goes beyond color or religion or politics. It is more important than race or where it is.”

Pat Riley, coach of the Los Angeles Lakers and the West All-Stars, said the coaches’ association was considering a contribution also.

“What a magnificent thing this is,” Riley said. “Nobody forced the players to do this. It is from the heart.”

“I guess this shows that today’s athletes aren’t just bottom-liners,” said Bob Cousy, the legendary Celtic here for the old-timers’ game Saturday.

“The players of the NBA are truly capturing the spirit of America by demonstrating their whole-hearted support for the people trapped by the crisis in Ethiopia,” said NBA commissioner David Stern, who made sure a press release with his endorsement was handy.

Whatever motives are behind the effort will make little difference to the famine victims it will help.

“We’re hoping to do more,” English said. “We may run some all-star games this summer to raise more money.”

English hopes to go to Ethiopia and film a TV documentary about the problem.

“We would really like to see it snowball,” he said. “The important thing is to get others to join in, to make the general population more conscious of the situation.

“We should all be ready to reach back and help people. One person can’t do much, but if you can get the masses together, anything can be done.

“Maybe the hockey or baseball or football players could do the same thing with their All-Star games.”

Has English spoken to them about it?

“I don’t know any baseball or football players,” he said.

That’s their loss.

Keywords: ALEX ENGLISH BIOGRAPHY

The last name of Larry Fleisher is mispelled in this story. The Tribune regrets the error.

ATHLETES JUST NOT THE RETIRING TYPES

The most difficult thing any athlete has to face is that moment when he knows he is no longer able to play the game. Few walk away on top. Some are carried away. Most are simply excused. Occasionally one is ignored into retirement, which is pretty much what happened to Greg Luzinski.

Retirements are, at the same time, not unlike vaccinations. We have to wait a while to see if they take. Any one of us could retire ourselves if we had just had the ice concession for all of Muhammad Ali’s retirement parties. Or half of Billie Jean King’s.

I do not believe we have seen the last of Luzinski, not only because he is visible from so great a distance, but because some American League team will find a hole in its right-handed power before May and remember Luzinski’s roofers instead of his dribblers to second base. Maybe even the White Sox.

For now, let us concede Luzinski’s collision with the inevitable, however it came about.

Great athletes who have quit in their prime can be counted on one hand. Rocky Marciano. Sandy Koufax. Jim Brown. Bob Cousy. That’s it. Think of another one and the next Lite beer from Miller is on the house.

Pete Rose had to beg, take a pay cut and then a second job to keep chasing Ty Cobb. Julius Erving soars only when absolutely necessary these days and is often a fourth-quarter decoy. Franco Harris allowed his glory to be tarnished by strangers. Gordie Howe, for all we know, may still be playing hockey somewhere.

Aging athletes disturb our memories. We would much rather see Arnold Palmer make his first putt than his fourth. Franz Klammer should never have skied again in public after his 1976 Olympic downhill. Reggie Jackson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar ought to always have more hair than the rest of us. Horses have the right idea. Win the Triple Crown and go to bed.

Not all athletes will admit being aware of the exact moment that the end came, but they all know. I remember talking to Bubba Smith and other Lite beer salesmen about this very thing, and Smith nearly broke into tears recalling the end.

“I was only 27 years old,” Smith said. “I went down on a yard marker in Tampa (and tore up a knee). It was so unfair. I never played a full game again. I ended up in Houston as a substitute for my little brother.”

Bernie Geoffrion first left hockey at age 32. He wanted to be a coach, and he said Montreal promised he would take over the Canadiens after some schooling in the minors. “They never called me back,” said Geoffrion, who unretired to play in New York, and did, in fact, coach the Canadiens. “I see they were just pushing me aside for young kids.”

Impatient youth can shove harder than the calendar.

Ray Nitschke is in football’s Hall of Fame. He played 15 years in Green Bay, his last one as a substitute linebacker. “I was cut in training camp (by Dan Devine in 1973),” Nitschke said. “Most of Lombardi’s boys were already gone and I knew it had to happen to me sometime, but it didn’t make it any easier.

“The hardest thing any athlete has to do is realize you’re only on stage for a little while. But, oh, it is so hard to resist taking one more bow.”

Len Dawson was past 40 when he stopped playing quarterback for Kansas City.

“When do you get out?” he asked. “The only guy who can decide is the athlete himself. It’s never a question of how much you’ve done or what you’ve achieved. There’s always something you still have to prove, even if it’s only to prove you can recapture something.

“Then there’s the question of still believing you have the skills. It’s no different for anyone who ever played a game. Everyone plays like that.”

No one put this in better perspective for me than Rocky Graziano, the old middleweight champ, who was explaining at the time why Ali kept fighting.

“A fighter, a champeen,” Graziano said, “he fights maybe 10 fights after he’s through. He fights them for the money.

“Then if he’s smart, or lucky, he gets out. I see old champs all the time. Whadda they doing? They’re caddies, shoeshine boys. I see old champs all the time. Bette”

Bob Lilly, the great defensive tackle for Dallas, admitted he played two years too long.

“I left because I didn’t want to be on the sidelines, waving at the crowd,” Lilly said. “The thing I didn’t want to do was to have a good career and then wind up with people laughing at me and running over me. There’s so much money out there, but money has nothing to do with it, finally. We all have to quit.”

I always believed that Chris Evert Lloyd, for seven years the uncontested best female tennis player on the planet, would walk away on top. The first year she slipped from No. 1, we talked about her choices.

“What I have to decide,” she said, “is if I want to make a million dollars a year but be No. 3 in the world.”

She took the money. They all do. So would we.

Keywords: ANALYSIS

ATHLETES JUST NOT THE RETIRING TYPES

The most difficult thing any athlete has to face is that moment when he knows he is no longer able to play the game. Few walk away on top. Some are carried away. Most are simply excused. Occasionally one is ignored into retirement, which is pretty much what happened to Greg Luzinski.

Retirements are, at the same time, not unlike vaccinations. We have to wait a while to see if they take. Any one of us could retire ourselves if we had just had the ice concession for all of Muhammad Ali’s retirement parties. Or half of Billie Jean King’s.

I do not believe we have seen the last of Luzinski, not only because he is visible from so great a distance, but because some American League team will find a hole in its right-handed power before May and remember Luzinski’s roofers instead of his dribblers to second base. Maybe even the White Sox.

For now, let us concede Luzinski’s collision with the inevitable, however it came about.

Great athletes who have quit in their prime can be counted on one hand. Rocky Marciano. Sandy Koufax. Jim Brown. Bob Cousy. That’s it. Think of another one and the next Lite beer from Miller is on the house.

Pete Rose had to beg, take a pay cut and then a second job to keep chasing Ty Cobb. Julius Erving soars only when absolutely necessary these days and is often a fourth-quarter decoy. Franco Harris allowed his glory to be tarnished by strangers. Gordie Howe, for all we know, may still be playing hockey somewhere.

Aging athletes disturb our memories. We would much rather see Arnold Palmer make his first putt than his fourth. Franz Klammer should never have skied again in public after his 1976 Olympic downhill. Reggie Jackson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar ought to always have more hair than the rest of us. Horses have the right idea. Win the Triple Crown and go to bed.

Not all athletes will admit being aware of the exact moment that the end came, but they all know. I remember talking to Bubba Smith and other Lite beer salesmen about this very thing, and Smith nearly broke into tears recalling the end.

“I was only 27 years old,” Smith said. “I went down on a yard marker in Tampa (and tore up a knee). It was so unfair. I never played a full game again. I ended up in Houston as a substitute for my little brother.”

Bernie Geoffrion first left hockey at age 32. He wanted to be a coach, and he said Montreal promised he would take over the Canadiens after some schooling in the minors. “They never called me back,” said Geoffrion, who unretired to play in New York, and did, in fact, coach the Canadiens. “I see they were just pushing me aside for young kids.”

Impatient youth can shove harder than the calendar.

Ray Nitschke is in football’s Hall of Fame. He played 15 years in Green Bay, his last one as a substitute linebacker. “I was cut in training camp (by Dan Devine in 1973),” Nitschke said. “Most of Lombardi’s boys were already gone and I knew it had to happen to me sometime, but it didn’t make it any easier.

“The hardest thing any athlete has to do is realize you’re only on stage for a little while. But, oh, it is so hard to resist taking one more bow.”

Len Dawson was past 40 when he stopped playing quarterback for Kansas City.

“When do you get out?” he asked. “The only guy who can decide is the athlete himself. It’s never a question of how much you’ve done or what you’ve achieved. There’s always something you still have to prove, even if it’s only to prove you can recapture something.

“Then there’s the question of still believing you have the skills. It’s no different for anyone who ever played a game. Everyone plays like that.”

No one put this in better perspective for me than Rocky Graziano, the old middleweight champ, who was explaining at the time why Ali kept fighting.

“A fighter, a champeen,” Graziano said, “he fights maybe 10 fights after he’s through. He fights them for the money.

“Then if he’s smart, or lucky, he gets out. I see old champs all the time. Whadda they doing? They’re caddies, shoeshine boys. I see old champs all the time. Bette”

Bob Lilly, the great defensive tackle for Dallas, admitted he played two years too long.

“I left because I didn’t want to be on the sidelines, waving at the crowd,” Lilly said. “The thing I didn’t want to do was to have a good career and then wind up with people laughing at me and running over me. There’s so much money out there, but money has nothing to do with it, finally. We all have to quit.”

I always believed that Chris Evert Lloyd, for seven years the uncontested best female tennis player on the planet, would walk away on top. The first year she slipped from No. 1, we talked about her choices.

“What I have to decide,” she said, “is if I want to make a million dollars a year but be No. 3 in the world.”

She took the money. They all do. So would we.

Keywords: ANALYSIS

BASEBALL FINDS A PERFECT GAME

Arbitration has been a part of baseball for a dozen years now, but that doesn’t make it any easier to explain. It works basically this way.

Baseball players don’t have to ask the owner of the team for a raise. They can ask the government.

One considers the wisdom of this arrangement.

The last time I asked the government for anything–a new driver’s license –I got mail for the next two months trying to sell me plastic seat covers.

The driver’s license came much later under separate cover.

That has been my experience with the machinery of arbitration, and baseball players have my sympathy. I imagine the real reason so many of them never actually sit down with an arbitrator is because they have no idea how to fit seat covers on a Ferrari.

Still, 98 players filed for arbitration this year, preferring the modern method of settling contract disputes to the old way, which served baseball diligently for more than 100 years.

Baseball has always resisted rushing headlong into progress. The guiding creed of baseball is to wait before putting one high-button shoe in front of the other. It took the National Labor Relations Board to change things.

This is how arbitration is supposed to keep order in baseball.

A player takes all of his statistics before a stranger who judges whether they are worth what the player thinks they are.

An owner takes his statistics before a stranger, who is surprised to learn that the owner is talking about the same player who was in just a few minutes before.

Batters show things like runs batted in, hits and runs scored.

Owners show times grounded into double plays, strikeouts and times picked off first base.

Pitchers show earned-run average, victories and strikeouts.

Owners show winning runs allowed, losses and bases on balls.

The arbitrator then figures out who is the poorer liar and makes a decision.

Players and owners used to sort this stuff out between themselves. This was before agents and the NLRB started poking around in the grand old game.

The owner would sip his mint julep and try not to look at his watch while the player made his case, and then the owner would decide how much money the player would get.

This seemed sort of one-sided to the players.

Long arguments and holdouts would result, and the best players would generally get half of what they asked for, while mediocre players would be traded to Cleveland.

Not only are things much more democratic now, thanks to arbitration, but the public gets to watch.

In order for arbitration to work, the arbitrator needs to know how much money players of equal ability and position are making.

The owners provide this information to the players’ union, which passes it along to its members.

The players want to know how much someone else is making so they can ask for at least as much money without blushing.

Before arbitration became an annual February adventure, the only people who knew what ballplayers earned were sportswriters, who had heard the figures from the barber of a front-office secretary’s husband.

This was known, in the business, as a reliable source.

Nobody ever thought of coming right out and asking Carlton Fisk how much money he made. Only golfers, auto racers and jockeys tell us that, and we all know what kind of athletes they are.

Arbitration has removed from baseball any reason to be devious, which has changed a lot of general managers into accountants, not a pretty sight.

The only hitch in all of this is that the arbitrator can decide on only one salary figure, either the player’s or the owner’s.

If, as has been determined from a reliable source, Leon Durham wants $1.1 million and the Cubs only offer $800,000, there can be no compromise at $950,000.

The mere threat of an objective judge deciding on the higher figure tends to cause unreasonable panic in front offices and baseless arrogance in the clubhouse.

What happens is players ask for more money than they think they can get and the owners counter with more money than they think they should pay.

And the ultimate irony is that usually the whole thing is settled without an arbitrator.

The player makes so much money he doesn’t have to play as hard as he did when he was poor, the owner cries poverty and raises ticket prices, which he was always looking for an excuse to do anyhow, and everybody blames the government.

I would say the system is perfect.

IF ONLY SOCCER WERE FAST FOOD

Willy Roy believes there will come a day when the name Sting will jerk the emotions of Chicago with as much force as do the names Cubs, Bears, Hawks, Sox and Bulls, but he will not dispute the order of affection at present, even during those nights when his soccer team tempts more folks to the Stadium than do the Bulls.

“I am a realist. I am an optimist,” Roy said. “You can be both.”

Roy coaches soccer for pay, which in this country is an achievement of remarkable proportions. There are barely enough teams left to employ an only child, which is one way to cure nepotism.

“I wouldn’t be honest if I said I didn’t wish we were the first name on everybody’s lips,” Roy said. “But we aren’t. I do think we are a special story. With our competition, not just the Bulls and the Hawks but De Paul and Loyola, to do what we do, I would say we were a tremendous success.”

During Roy’s tenure as headmaster of the Sting, outdoor soccer has shrunk to near invisibility, and indoor soccer is a hybrid scorned by purists, otherwise known as immigrants.

Indoor soccer is pocket soccer, smaller, faster and warmer, and the only version of soccer Americans seem interested in supporting.

“People are always asking me why soccer is failing,” Roy said. “I wouldn’t say that a core of 10-to-15,000 people is failing.”

Official figures place Sting average attendance at 10,162, about twice as much as other soccer cities with similar competition, namely the Cosmos of New York and the Lazers of Los Angeles.

Why does soccer work here better than there?

“We sell a product that is exciting,” Roy said. “Even when we lose, it is a slugfest. I would rather lose 10-9, because at least you’ve learned how to score 9 goals. Nobody learns anything from losing 2-1.

“And I think we represent the population of Chicago better than any other sports team. We have Latins and Europeans and English, somebody everybody can identify with.”

And there is Roy himself, German at birth, American at heart.

“We should never forget we are blessed to live in this country,” Roy said. “Where else can you bitch at the President and get away with it? Do that to Chernenko and you spend six months in Siberia.”

Patriotism has nothing to do with Roy’s exceptional ability to find talent, it would seem, by turning over rocks, the cheaper the better.

“I don’t think life should be measured in monetary things,” Roy said.

Since the last indoor season, Roy has added 13 new faces to his roster of 22. Only Karl-Heinz Granitza and Pato Margetic are big-salaried players. The rest work for modest wages and, more remarkably, work well together.

At the halfway point of this season, the Sting is threatening to add an indoor title to its two outdoor, an unexpected development to everyone but Roy.

“I would never bet against Tom Flores or the Miami Dolphins,” Roy said. “There is a reason they are always on top.”

Translation: Never bet against the Sting or Roy himself. Or the future of soccer, no matter how desperate it would appear.

“I think soccer is exactly right for this time,” Roy said. “We’re on a health kick as a nation. Soccer is the best exercise for the cardiovascular system, you have fun doing it and it doesn’t cost much money.”

Roy is a persuasive man, with strong opinions about everything that has to do with sports in Chicago. “Why doesn’t Ditka throw the ball to Willie Gault more? When are we going to get a decent stadium in The City That Works?” he wondered. You hope he doesn’t resort to the tattered argument now two generations old: Wait until the kids grow up.

Of course, he does just that.

“Our base,” he said, “is the young people. We’re like McDonald’s. When they started, they didn’t try to get the steak-eater. They went for the kids. Look where they are now.”

Not the kids, McDonald’s.

When that argument was first used, today’s 30-year-olds were yesterday’s infant midfielders, and the evidence is that they couldn’t drag their folks to a game they weren’t playing in then nor are they showing up in enormous numbers now.

If every kid who ever stuck his legs through a pair of soccer shorts were now a paying spectator, there wouldn’t be enough room for them all, even if you counted every knee and divided by two.

“Our time will come,” Roy insisted. “I’m a positive guy. There are just too many kids, too many involved. All the signs are positive. Like the Olympics. They drew 1.4 million for soccer, more than all the other sports combined. That has to mean something.”

What it might mean is that soccer was the easiest ticket to get. It was played in the largest stadium and people shut out of things they really wanted to see would resort to watching soccer just to be part of the Olympics.

“We’re going to keep plugging away,” Roy said. “If you plug long enough, you fill some holes.”

BILLY SMITH’S DEED MERELY SELF DEFENSE

The problem with sticking up for Billy Smith is that he does it so well himself. Stick up, I mean. In fact, that is exactly what will put him out of hockey for six games, a punishment most folks in Chicago who follow collision skating consider a slap on the mittens.

Smith, for those who think the only sensible use for ice is to tame bourbon, is the goaltender for the New York Islanders. He wears a cage on his face and mattresses on his hands and carries a cudgel that he sometimes uses to hit a hockey puck. Other times he uses it to bludgeon people, and that usually is good for a stern scolding.

Most recently it was good for a suspension, though the logic behind the censure of Smith is curious. He was determined not to be guilty of actual assault but was held responsible for causing an accident. In the real world, this would translate into manslaughter, had anyone died.

Not that the rules of hockey parallel the rules of civilized behavior. If they did, we would have ice dancing and empty arenas.

A short time back, Smith poked his stick into the face of Black Hawk Curt Fraser, rearranging considerable tissue and causing immediate pain. How damaged Fraser’s psyche is has yet to be determined, though one imagines he will be reluctant to skate into peril face-first for a while.

After allowing nature to knit his face back to some semblance of the one in his team photo, Fraser has returned to combat. Smith awaits his sentence without regret.

There should be no surprise in any of this. Any game that puts clubs in the hands of its contestants invites their use as weapons. Anyone who thinks otherwise will also insist that he can see the puck, which we all know is a fantasy born out of the need not to appear stupid for sitting around watching shabbily dressed Canadians, and the odd American, chase the invisible.

What passes for order in hockey is the penalizing of unsanctioned violence, divided into major and minor infractions. Smith’s immediate punishment for cracking Fraser was minor, 2 minutes of inactivity, served, as is the fashion for goalies, by a proxy whose only crime was to be a teammate. Hockey disciples know this kind of thing happens all the time, and in fact, Smith is notorious for fending off attackers with his stick. Smith is rather a pioneer of the art.

Smith refuses to allow any opponents to camp near the net. He’ll whack them to keep them from coming too close and to keep his field of vision from becoming cluttered.

I think that’s fair.

Hockey goalies have to be the most vulnerable targets in sports. A modern slapshot will travel more than 100 miles an hour, and even when the puck can be seen, it cannot always be avoided. That’s why goalies wear masks. In fact, on the night of Smith’s transgression, Black Hawk goalie Murray Bannerman was excused from the game after being struck with a deflected puck, a natural hazard to which no one raised objection.

Most hockey goals are scored, not elegantly, when a bunch of guys gang up in front of the net, and suddenly the puck comes screaming out of the chaos towards the solitary guardian of the goal.

Even occasional hockey watchers ought to understand that goalies should be allowed to sweep away the debris of ambush.

Though Smith does not move more than a couple of yards all night, he’s more fun to watch than Wayne Gretzky or Mike Bossy or any of the scorers on ice.

I can’t identify with the agility of ice skaters, but I can with the stubbornness of Smith. He could be any of us under attack, turning back assailants, protecting our homes, defending our honor, refusing to cry uncle. There is a nobility in what Smith does and a fascination for the way he does it. Smith attacks from goal. He dives and stretches and smothers and slashes and punches. He is not dainty.

Smith is that marvel of athletes, both hero and villain. It is possible to be both in hockey, if not common.

Hockey is not unlike roller derby. You have good guys and bad guys, and if you confuse your audience over which is which, they will ignore you for comic books.

You picture Smith as the guy who stays behind in the foxhole while medics carry the wounded to safety, daring the enemy to cross him.

Those guys usually get medals. Or eulogies.

‘SUBWAY SERIES’ TAKES FANS FOR RIDE

Baseball in Chicago is arranged under the tidy assumption that Cub fans and Sox fans will never have to suffer the company of each other except on public transportation or during the odd elevator ride when, for lack of other literature to help endure the trip, they might read one another’s T-shirts.

That is often what passes for literacy among the faithful of each team, neither of whom has ever been fascinated by the alphabet but can tell you in an instant how far behind in the standings the other guy’s team is.

There is a comforting reassurance to this natural order of things, for each fan has not only the success of his own heroes to encourage him, but the failure of his neighbor’s to make him feel better.

It is a wonderful system and one that should be protected for the good of all.

When the Cubs are up and the Sox down, as is the most recent arrangement, some gloating is evident. Cub fans take to wearing pictures of cuddly bears and even the name of the city we all share, while Sox fans are stuck with Eddie Einhorn.

The Cubs’ constituency has always felt it had the advantage in these encounters, having one more letter in its last name than do the modern Sox, who used to have a first and a middle name but have recently lopped off color and place as redundant or too taxing to be read all in one sitting.

The Sox are just the Sox, happily truncated and phonetic, a distinction that is sufficient enough to foster a private superiority over the Cubs. No place name is needed to identify Sox allegiance, and even more than casual inspection will reveal no hint of geography.

The Sox know who they are, and so do their fans, who conveniently ignore the city of Boston and its Sox of a different color, as well as the perpetual error of Noah Webster and his heirs, who insist on spelling Sox funny in the dictionary.

Life progresses through the seasons here with mostly civic tolerance to these differences, and outright violence is infrequent, especially since the Sox again started tucking their shirts in and wearing pants that cover their knees.

The Cubs stay in their warren to the north and the Sox in theirs to the south, at least for now, though the suspicion is growing that the Cubs may move south and the Sox north and west, if you can believe anybody who uses the words “new” and “stadium” in the same sentence.

No matter. The point of all this is to examine an announcement that the two teams will confront one another on the field in 1985, a year that is already racing past us.

Plans have been made to have an exhibition game at Comiskey Park on April 29, a date that would otherwise be left innocently vacant of baseball and could be set aside for something useful.

Next year, the two teams would do the same thing at Wrigley Field, though just when has not been determined.

This would appear to be one swell idea, or two if you count home-and-home games separately. Not so.

The only decent thing the Cubs and Sox can do to satisfy their fans is to meet in the World Series. Both teams would have had to put away the rest of their companions over the long season and set up an authentic showdown.

Meaningless exhibitions will satisfy no one. Some arguments should never be settled for fun, or worse, as appears the case here, for profit.

The Cubs and Sox used to play each other often, and the fact that they haven’t for a while has not resulted in a great outcry for them to resume. In the past, assorted charities benefited from the games, which was at least a noble if predictable excuse.

These games will be played not for the fans, or for charity, but for the Cub and Sox payrolls. The two teams will split the proceeds.

In other words, the Cubs and Sox will be exploiting the fragile emotions of their audience for the money, which reduces the whole thing to the level of wrestling, except no one will know ahead of time who the winner is.

But too many people will care.

SUBSTANCE LOST OUT TO NAMATH’S STYLE

JOE NAMATH WOULD not be much on our minds these days except for two astonishing developments. First, he got married, and second, he joined pro football’s Hall of Fame, only one of which, as far as is known, required a vote.

Namath as a groom may be more intriguing than Namath as an all-time hero, since his reputation as a bachelor always exceeded his fame as a quarterback. Namath had one great moment on the football field. The number and intensity of his other accomplishments will have to wait for his memoirs.

I suppose he deserves to be in the Hall of Fame for no other reason than that magic afternoon in Super Bowl III, when he brought the American Football League from tourist to first class. But he never did anything with a football before or after that day that warrants enshrinement in Canton, Ohio, the last place anyone nicknamed Broadway would be expected to be found anyhow.

FOR THOSE WHO have forgotten the legacy of Namath, he once represented a generation, right up there with the Beatles and Muhammad Ali.

His last game, if memory serves, was a losing playoff encounter six years ago between the Los Angeles Rams, for whom he lurked in the final year of his career, and the Minnesota Vikings.

The end was not what his legend demanded. For those who believed he was everything romantic and compelling in sports, Namath should have gone down under a fierce pass rush, pinpointing one last touchdown pass to win the big game. He should have been carried off on his shield, thumbing his nose at the world in one final, glorious act of defiance.

Instead, the man who once joked about sleeping through college sat alone on the bench of a team most of us can’t remember he ever suited up for while Pat Haden, a Rhodes Scholar, swept up in front of him.

The man who once saved a league with the New York Jets was not asked to save a single game for the Rams.

IT WAS AN END not uncommon in sports. Babe Ruth ran out his string with the Boston Braves, leaving his team in a pique because it wouldn’t give him the day off. Ali fought pygmies for money, losing his last fight in front of foreigners because they were the only ones who could watch without turning their heads. Billie Jean King hung on and on, willing to lose tennis matches to children.

And like them, Namath was always bigger than the game he played. He has managed to remain with us, more or less, as a fitful actor, a celebrity bowler or some such.

It takes a Hall of Fame endorsement for us to remember what he was. Namath’s real importance and his real credentials for the Hall of Fame were his influence on his sport and on his time. What he was and what he did linger still like a locker-room odor.

He was the first to give football players an exaggerated value of their own worth, getting nearly half a million dollars as a rookie and immediately jacking up the wages of combat.

Any sports contract that does not begin on the fat side of $1 million these days is not worth mentioning.

NAMATH’S LIFESTYLE, outrageous in his day, is commonplace now. Not that booze and women were ever out of fashion with athletes, but Namath made both a status symbol for the successful jock. Booze has been replaced by more exotic mindbenders, a not surprising progression.

A more trivial example of a Namath affectation that became routine is white shoes. It is difficult to find an athlete south of Minnesota who wears basic black on his feet instead of white. And are we all too young to remember when Namath was the only one who wore them?

Namath’s long hair set a style not only in sports but also in the larger arena. Executives who would have been the first to yell, “Get a hair cut!” in 1968, became shaggier than Namath ever was, and like the original he was, Namath showed his ears again long before they showed theirs.

Namath was the first athlete who got away with being different. “Do your own thing” became a catch phrase for a generation.

BY BEATING THE establishment in the Super Bowl, and by challenging it when he quit football in dispute over ownership of a bar, he set the tone for much of the later rebelliousness of athletes everywhere.

Namath’s demand for freedom was echoed in player strikes in both football and baseball. For better or worse, the roots of almost all athletic unrest can be traced to Namath’s trend-setting belligerence.

It was no accident that Namath’s greatest glory came in the ’60s. He was the kind of hero an uncomfortable nation was looking for–arrogant, self- confident and a rebel.

And it is worth noting that, as the turbulent ’60s gave way to the complacent ’70s, Namath gave way also. Here in the causeless ’80s, he is just another Yuppie whose only rebellion is against polyester.

Now he is being honored by the establishment he once taunted, going into the Hall of Fame at the same time as no less than the high commissioner of the game himself, Pete Rozelle, which proves what we’ve always suspected: Young pioneers have a way of becoming old proprietors.

Montana the Best? No Argument Here

WHAT A RELIEF it will be to pass through the approaching NFL-less months without having to worry about who the greatest quarterback in football is.

We now know that it is Joe Montana of San Francisco, an issue that was settled clearly in Super Bowl XIX and the only reason to remember the game at all, unless you count the human American flag that boogied during the National Anthem.

Montana is the best quarterback, and a more reluctant hero we have not had in football since last year, when Jim Plunkett mumbled his way into our hearts.

“Joe is the greatest quarterback in football today,” said his coach, Bill Walsh, and if you can’t trust a guy who always dresses in white, who can you trust?

“Joe Montana is the best that ever played,” said Dwight Clark, who used to be Montana’s roommate and still serves as Montana’s landlord between brides.

“Joe has established himself as maybe the finest quarterback to play,” said Paul Hackett, who is only Montana’s personal coach.

There we have three perfectly objective endorsements, and, of course, our own eyes.

SUPER BOWL XIX was just the latest chapter in the Joe Montana (Montagna in the original Italian) story. The beginning was back in Monongahela, Pa., in the back yard where an only child already burdened with the designation of junior after his name caught footballs thrown by a father determined to make him a great athlete.

The story moved to Notre Dame where, from seventh string, Montana became a college legend. Montana brought the Irish from behind no less than half a dozen times in his three seasons of play there, from a 20-point rescue against Air Force, to a 35-34 victory over Houston in the Cotton Bowl with no time left after Notre Dame had fallen behind 34-12.

And now to San Francisco, where in just six years Montana has won two Super Bowls and has been the outstanding player in each one.

“I don’t know how I’ve been able to do these things,” Montana said. “I just go out there and try to win.”

You don’t learn much about Montana from Montana. For a young man consistently described as fiercely competitive, he is absolutely timid in public.

In any gathering, he would be the one most likely to pass for a sarcophagus.

He speaks softly, though he always fixes the questioner with his clear blue eyes, and he always stops his answer short of anything revealing, though he did confess after this Super Bowl that the one thing that most upset him was being called a wimp by “a writer from Miami.”

OF COURSE, NO ONE in San Francisco would call him that, no matter how tempted by Montana’s hermit instincts. In fact, Montana was declared God for a Day by one group of sign painters who watched the 49er victory parade that Montana skipped.

In all candor, Montana does not look like a quarterback. What he looks like is somebody who carries your groceries to the car.

“The good Lord did not put him together like Dan Marino,” said 49er guard Randy Cross, “but he can run, pass and get out of the way of problems. Marino is the best thrower in the league. Joe Montana is the best quarterback.”

“He is not a flamboyant person,” said Walsh. “He’s like a great writer or musician. There’s something internal that you just know.

“People will play alongside him more smoothly than someone who attracts a lot of attention. He doesn’t have that bravado that certain people who are less smart have.”

What Montana has are results. Notre Dame used to cheer when Dan Devine would finally put Montana into a game, usually when it appeared lost. Devine likes to take credit for discovering Montana, but there is a story around that, during Montana’s junior year, after two Notre Dame quarterbacks had been hurt, Devine whirled angrily and yelled at his assistants, “Get me a quarterback!”

Montana was sent into the game. He brought the Irish back to beat Purdue, causing Devine to ask, “What’s that kid’s name?”

WALSH AND MONTANA are an ideal pair, kind of like a professor and his puppy. Here’s a new trick, Joe. Roll over and stand on one leg. Isn’t he cute? “He is extremely coachable,” said Walsh, “and he is very inventive.”

Walsh first saw Montana when Walsh was working out UCLA running back James Owens before the 1979 draft. Owens had brought Montana along to throw the ball to him, and Walsh was impressed enough to forget Owens and make Montana the 49ers’ second selection.

The choice was high enough to startle NFL scouts. “They questioned his consistency,” said Walsh, “but I felt that was the fault of Notre Dame. I wondered why, if he could have one great game, why not two, or three? They said his arm wasn’t strong enough, but it is as strong as Dan Fouts’. I put his arm in the 90th percentile.

“Joe has leadership, instinct, resourcefulness, maturity. We have the most detailed offense in the league. The quarterback is our limit. But with Joe, we don’t have a limit.”

End of argument.